<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democratic Capitalism Rides Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toryanarchist.com/2007/07/03/democratic-capitalism-rides-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toryanarchist.com/2007/07/03/democratic-capitalism-rides-again/</link>
	<description>www.ToryAnarchist.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://toryanarchist.com/2007/07/03/democratic-capitalism-rides-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toryanarchist.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/democratic-capitalism-rides-again/#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Rs9sinZJ_4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Rs9sinZJ_4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Rs9sinZJ_4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://toryanarchist.com/2007/07/03/democratic-capitalism-rides-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toryanarchist.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/democratic-capitalism-rides-again/#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>I shouldn't air dirty laundry like this, but I too was rather shocked by the inclusion of Barber in TAC - I had the opportunity to raise it with Kara who defended it on the grounds of being about "protecting childhood", a very odd way of arguing for that if that was Barber's intent.

She went on to reiterate the principle that I certainly am behind 110% but if nothing else I felt Barber pushed the limits of - "If we demanded complete purity on all issues from anyone who ever wrote for us we would have only three contributors and have to change our name to Chronicles."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shouldn&#8217;t air dirty laundry like this, but I too was rather shocked by the inclusion of Barber in TAC - I had the opportunity to raise it with Kara who defended it on the grounds of being about &#8220;protecting childhood&#8221;, a very odd way of arguing for that if that was Barber&#8217;s intent.</p>
<p>She went on to reiterate the principle that I certainly am behind 110% but if nothing else I felt Barber pushed the limits of - &#8220;If we demanded complete purity on all issues from anyone who ever wrote for us we would have only three contributors and have to change our name to Chronicles.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.294 seconds -->
